Juda parks east chicago

Virlissa Crenshaw, 42, of East Chicago — charged with theft from a local government entity and with filing a false tax return for the tax year. Crenshaw was the only one responsible for the bonds during after hours.

The Indiana State Board of Accounts discovered in an audit that the records books did not match the actual money collected. Crenshaw is also being sued by the state for the missing money, and that lawsuit claims she would sometimes use bond money from one defendant to cover the missing bond from another defendant to cover her tracks. Crenshaw, who is married to a nephew of Lake County Prosecutor Bernard Carter, signed a plea agreement filed in conjunction with the indictment admitting her guilt to all charges.

Crenshaw faces up to 10 years in prison for pleading guilty to the counts, although the government promises not to prosecute her husband with any criminal tax charges.

The government will also recommend she serve the minimum of federal sentencing guidelines. Manuel Montalvo, 38, of East Chicago — charged with two counts of filing false tax returns for the tax years and It was unclear as of Thursday evening if Montalvo, who was arrested Thursday morning, had made his initial appearance.

He faces up to three years in prison if convicted. Montalvo, who also once served as the Lake County Democratic Party secretary, was found guilty in of battery against two South Shore commuter railroad police officers, disorderly conduct and criminal tresspass. The conviction was in connection to a fight he got into with police while trying to get on a South Shore train. Juda Parks to toss a lawsuit filed by two women that alleges Parks violated their constitutional rights by asking for nude photos and harassing them on the job.

District Court Judge James T. Moody March 31 ruled against the request for summary judgment filed by Parks and the City of East Chicago, the defendants in the case.

The women were part of the East Chicago police officer training program where Parks was an instructor, and allege the harassment took place during that period. The plaintiffs, Madeline Melendez and Ashly Rodriguez, allege the Parks asked them for nude photos while he was assigned as their field training officer during the office training program. Melendez alleged Parks asked her for nude photographs while she was inside a police car with him during her field officer training program in , according to the court documents.

Defendant now seeks summary judgment on plaintiffs' claims. DE Plaintiffs filed a response DE 48 , and defendant filed no reply. The motion is now fully briefed and ripe for ruling. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 allows for the entry of summary judgment against a party "who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial. Catrett, U. In other words, the record must reveal that no reasonable jury could find for the non-moving party.

In responding to a motion for summary judgment, the non-moving party must identify specific facts establishing that there is a genuine issue of fact for trial. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. Marion County, F. In doing so, the non-moving party cannot rest on the pleadings alone, but must present fresh proof in support of its position. Anderson, U. City of Milwaukee, 17 F. A dispute about a material fact is genuine only "if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.

If no reasonable jury could find for the non-moving party, then there is no "genuine" dispute. Scott v. Harris, U. Plaintiffs have articulated only one claim against defendant: that he violated their constitutional rights to equal protection in violation of Section Individuals have a right, protected by the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution, to be free from discrimination on the basis of sex in public employment.

Davis v. Passman, U. Further, sexual harassment by a state actor under color of law is a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution and is actionable pursuant to Section Valentine v. City of Chicago, F. Chicago Transit Auth. At the summary judgment stage, a plaintiff must be able to point to evidence, if challenged, supporting the following: 1 she was subjected to unwelcome harassment; 2 the harassment was based on her gender; 3 the harassment was so severe or pervasive as to alter the condition of employment and create a hostile or abusive working environment; and 4 defendant committed the harassment himself and under color of law.

Wazny v.